The Case Against Mineral Toxin Binders
Various strategies have been identified by experts from the academe and the feed industry to reduce or prevent the adverse effects of mycotoxins on animal health and production. So far the most practical method is the inclusion of mvcotoxin adsorbents in feed. When an effective mycotoxin adsorbent is added to .feed, it adsorbs mycotoxins in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and they are safely excreted in feces, thereby preventing absorption and transport to target organs. The net effect is a reduction in the dose of absorbable toxin to a concentration that does not adversely affect animal performance.
Although mineral binders are relatively low priced in the market, they offer very limited protection against mycotoxins for several reasons:
• Some clay binders are processed, while others are crude inorganic preparations (e.g. zeolites and bentonites). The efficacy of such products is variable or inconsistent.
• Mineral mycotoxin binders, such as hydrated sodium aluminosilicates (HSCAS), are capable of binding only one specific mycotoxin (most commonly aflatoxin). Such products are not, therefore, effective against mycotoxins of varying molecular weight and polarity. It has been repeatedly demonstrated that clay binders are not effective against T-2 toxin, ochratoxins, DON, cyclopiazonic acid, zearalenone, diacetoxyyscirpenol, fumonisins and ergotamine.
• Clay binders offer low specificity and so must be used at a high level of inclusion (5 kg/metric ton of feed) to be effective.
















